Talk:Raid Reports

Old Data
So it has been brought to my attention that the data here may be too old to be valuable. Obviously, a new naming convention has been established for settlement names and the Attacking Creatures column is still reflective of the once all-powerful thief. As far as I know, the loot outcomes have not changed, but that may not be enough to warrant keeping this data around. While I'd hate to totally erase someone else's work, a decision needs to be made. Do we keep the data and add a disclaimer that unit composition may no longer be valid, or do we erase it all together? --Pho Kadat 16:45, July 26, 2011 (EDT)

New Data
If we decide to keep this page we need to include new raiding data. Of particular importance is Unit Composition so readers can get a feel for what works and what does not. A listing of loot is less important now that the XML data has been included on the settlement pages. --Pho Kadat 16:45, July 26, 2011 (EDT)

To Daemonic
This is your table:

And i think it can look better like this: --AnnoyingGuy

Hmmm... I like that a bit more, gives more useful information. The idea of the Series was to show the 1/3,2/3,3/3 sets together (they weren't done at the time i was adding this information here, but one is... maybe with the complete one it will look a little better). --Daemonic 10:57, July 28, 2011 (EDT)

"Possible Series" in my table is not for actual raid number that you made but its info how many raids you can do with this army and this healing rate cuz after all tables we create should help readers make their own army. --AnnoyingGuy

I see what you're saying. I was hoping to just provide more information so that we can maybe pull some of that information out. Today was the first time I went for a repeat of 3 raids with both groups. Still not sure it's completely safe. :) Daemonic